Document details for 'Not all Risks are Equal'

Authors Milne, C., Liu, J. and Butler, A.
Publication details Sustainable Production and Consumption, 1-9.
Keywords choice; decision; ordinal mixed-effects model; risk perceptions; risk preferences
Abstract Analysis of a survey of Scottish farmers (162) confirmed that they do not perceive all types of risk to be equal. Choices with potential negative ethical or health & safety consequences were perceived to be riskier than those that might have negative financial and social outcomes. A negative relationship was found between perceived riskiness and stated likelihood of taking a risky course of action with one exception - where a health & safety harm might arise. The findings could assist the development of behavioural models with greater predictive powers. In addition, the study suggests that risk awareness is not the most limiting factor for improving health & safety in the Scottish farming industry.
Last updated 2018-08-06
Links
  1. (untitled)
    https://doi.org/10.5836/ijam/2018-07-59

Unless explicitly stated otherwise, all material is copyright © Biomathematics and Statistics Scotland.

Biomathematics and Statistics Scotland (BioSS) is formally part of The James Hutton Institute (JHI), a registered Scottish charity No. SC041796 and a company limited by guarantee No. SC374831. Registered Office: JHI, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 5DA, Scotland