Document details for 'Power calculations for monitoring studies: a case study with alternative models for random variation'

Authors Elston, D.A., Nevison, I.M., Sier, A.R.J., Scott, A.W. and Morecroft, M.D.
Publication details Environmetrics 22(5), 618-625.
Keywords monitoring; biodiversity; composite indices; statistical power
Abstract Statistical assessment of any monitoring scheme should always take place ahead of its implementation, and formal power calculations play an important role in such assessments. The power calculations can either be used to help find a design with a stated probability of detecting a given trend or difference in trends at some level of significance, or they can be used to provide information about the magnitude of trend or difference in trends which is likely to be detected by a proposed monitoring scheme. In either case, the power calculations require estimates of variances or variance components. This paper describes a case study in which statistical powers are compared for two models for random variation over years within sites: a random regression coefficient model, and a first order autocorrelated error model. The response variables we present results for are unconstrained indices of butterfly abundance and constrained indices of plant species composition. The results indicate the effect of the different assumptions about random variation, in both the short and long term.
Last updated 2011-11-14

Unless explicitly stated otherwise, all material is copyright © Biomathematics and Statistics Scotland.

Biomathematics and Statistics Scotland (BioSS) is formally part of The James Hutton Institute (JHI), a registered Scottish charity No. SC041796 and a company limited by guarantee No. SC374831. Registered Office: JHI, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 5DA, Scotland